The unification of Europe in which Lithuania now takes part is in fact, much awaited, though not an easily manageable project.
It demands many changes in the local social structure.
Moreover, pessimistic critics of globalisation are inclined to interpret globalizing processes as social dystopias of the very near future.
No wonder that gloomy pictures of the future mature in such a climate of contradictions and reasonable worries.
So it is naturally cautious of the pitfalls of globalising trends that threaten the fragile and ambivalent content of its national culture.
It is no wonder that questions of national identity during recent years have been articulated openly and heatedly, occasionally even desperately in academic and public discourses.Anti-globalist movements encompassing all of the globe seem to resemble the desperate activities of Luddites during the ascent of the industrial revolution.Distrust toward neo-liberal doctrines that seem to be most powerful ideological tools and prime-movers of free market, and the conduct of transnational companies and corporations today, becomes stronger as these operating forces threaten to destroy national economies and sovereignties.The impact of globalising cultural trends on variety of national cultures has become one of the burning issues of the day.These days globalisation is often seen as a hegemonic discourse enveloping and affecting all possible cultural forms and its elements all over the world, both in post-modern and traditional societies.Having in mind that after half-century’s enforced relationship with the “Big Brother”, i.e.the Soviet Union and all the ill-effects this period of foreign oppression had upon Lithuanian society and its culture, it is not easy for the country to accommodate itself in new geo-political setting.It might be added though, that rapid expansion of globalisation and penetration of global forces into local societies and their markets inflicts feelings of insecurity, fear and disillusion in many regions of the world.Anti-globalist movements and their actions taken in many places of the world (the events of Genoa and Gothenburg are perhaps the most radical) have not the only responses to world-wide globalisation, but can be rightly considered also the very products and side-effects of its processes.It is a tiny country as far as its geography is concerned, though it has shrunk to these dimensions from a ten-times larger Medieval kingdom.It is burdened by the many cases of historical turbulence that befell on it during the last centuries, when it was forced to give up its statehood to foreign powers, and burdened by traumatic experiences gained during the Soviet occupation/colonisation that lasted almost half of the 20 century.