Tags: Ways To Start A EssayEmergency Medicine Residency Personal StatementsBusiness Plan For Medical ClinicUniversity Of Reading Essay WritingBackground Section Of Research Paper2nd Amendment Argumentative EssayWhat Is A Good Thesis Statement For The Novel The Things They CarriedPersuasive Essay Not Drinking Driving
Tillich, Dynamics of Faith Through his 1957 thought provoking Dynamics of Faith text on religious theory, American author Paul Tillich explores deep religious issues.To be precise, the author explores the relationship between the dynamics of character and faith besides describing faith as emanating from personality.
By presenting this bold view, the author avoids being trapped into the sensational waves that usually characterize contemporary religious writers.
This is because the author clearly states that when faith unites infinite reality with finite beings, aspects of uncertainty are involved.
Further, he does not wish to unnecessarily excite his audiences at the expense of their coming to accurate knowledge of the concept of faith.
Tillich’s openness, frankness, and depth of reasoning thus make the text very excellent.
On the flipside, Tillich’s book has a number of observable downsides which mostly have to do with unclear argumentation or irrational statements.
For instance, as he defines faith, the author holds that faith constitutes a central concept of demonstrating ultimate concern.Consequently, a keen analysis of Tillich’s text unearths a number of notable strong points based on the author’s sound arguments.To illustrate, by asserting that faith constitutes total personality, the author is spot on.In elaborating this statement, the author states that faith comprises a central concept that has to do with demonstrating ultimate concern.Conversely, the author explains that all faith-based acts have an element of doubt in them.This is because, in order to advance the aforementioned argument, the author has critically analyzed the role of free will in the depiction of faith by religious persons.Having thus established that free will leads to an aspect of risk, the author concludes that freewill is essential if faith is to be properly exhibited.Further, the author demonstrates critical thought while arguing that the uncertainty that accompanies faith is usually lost when religious or civil authorities impose conformity among religious persons.A close examination of this statement reveals that it is essentially a very deep philosophical argument.As is common among instrumental works, the book demonstrates a number of deficiencies which emanate from the usual complexity of religious concepts such as faith.On the other hand, the book has a number of significant strong points which demonstrate the author’s expertise in religious issues.