Selected Essays Hume

uses cookies to personalize content, tailor ads and improve the user experience.

Miller, with an appendix of variant readings from the 1889 edition by T. Yet a major part of this definitive collection, the Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary (a volume of near 600 pages, covering three decades of Hume’s career as a philosopher) has been largely ignored. By 1777, these essays from the original volumes would have gone through eleven editions.

Grose, revised edition (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund 1987). He worked on them continually from about 1740 until his death, in 1776.

A close comparison of their edition with that of 1777 shows, however, that it falls far short of the standards of accuracy that are adopted today in critical-text editing.2 There are hundreds of instances in which it departs, either intentionally or unintentionally, from the text of the 1777 edition.

Comparing Green and Grose’s “New Edition,” in the 1889 printing, with the 1777 text, we find at least 100 instances of incorrect wording (words dropped, added, or changed), 175 instances of incorrect punctuation, and 75 errors in capitalization.

These three essays were incorporated into the “Third Edition, Corrected” of for subsequent editions of his collected works, but he varied the format and contents somewhat.

Selected Essays Hume Brian Doyle The Best Nature Essay Ever

In 1748, three additional essays appeared in a small volume published in Edinburgh and London.7 That volume is noteworthy as the first of Hume’s works to bear his name and also as the beginning of his association with Andrew Millar as his chief London publisher.These bibliographical details are important because they show how highly the essays were regarded by Hume himself and by many others up to the present century.Over the past seventy years, however, the essays have been overshadowed, just as the 16—Liberty Fund has made a neglected side of Hume’s thought accessible once again to the modern reader.Hume’s peculiarities of spelling, punctuation, and capitalization have been retained, because these often bear on the meaning of the text.3 The reader should know, however, that there are some minor departures in the present edition from that of 1777: (1) typographical errors in the 1777 edition have been corrected silently; (2) Greek passages are reprinted as they appear in Green and Grose, with corrections and accents; (3) footnotes are designated by arabic numerals rather than by Hume’s symbols (in cases where these designations are adjacent to the punctuation mark, they have been relocated so that they follow, rather than precede, the mark); (4) whereas Hume’s longer footnotes are lettered and collected at the end of the volume in the 1777 edition, the present edition puts them at the bottom of the appropriate page, as was the practice in editions of the up to 1770 (with the change in location, it was no longer appropriate to capitalize the first word of these footnotes); (5) whereas two sizes of capitals as well as lowercase letters are used in essay titles in the 1777 edition, titles here are in level capitals; (6) the “long s” has been eliminated throughout; and (7) the running quotation marks in the left margin have been omitted, and the use of quotation marks has been made to conform to modern practice. The editor’s notes are enclosed in brackets to distinguish them from Hume’s own notes.Information that I have added to Hume’s footnotes is also bracketed. Google(); req('single_work'); $('.js-splash-single-step-signup-download-button').one('click', function(e){ req_and_ready('single_work', function() ); new c. edited and with a Foreword, Notes, and Glossary by Eugene F. “We have Hume’s own word that the definitive statement of his philosophy is not to be found in the youthful Treatise of Human Nature but in the 1777 posthumous edition of his collected works entitled Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects. There are thirty-nine essays in the posthumous, 1777, edition of (1741–42).Many years after Hume’s death, his close friend John Home wrote a sketch of Hume’s character, in the course of which he observed: “His Essays are at once popular and philosophical, and contain a rare and happy union of profound Science and fine writing.”17 This observation indicates why Hume’s essays were held in such high esteem by his contemporaries and why they continue to deserve our attention today. Grose for the version of the Because of initial difficulties in obtaining a photocopy of the 1777 edition, Green and Grose’s text was used as editor’s copy for the current project.The essays are elegant and entertaining in style, but thoroughly philosophical in temper and content. Both the editor’s copy and the compositor’s reading proofs were then corrected against a photocopy of the 1777 edition obtained from the Huntington Library, San Marino, California.The two most important were deemed too controversial for the religious climate of his time. S., and The Scottish National Portrait Gallery, Edinburgh, Scotland. Allow me a little time, that I may see how the Public receives the alterations.”10 Hume’s essays were received warmly in Britain, on the Continent, where numerous translations into French, German, and Italian appeared, and in America.The copyright to this edition, in both print and electronic forms, is held by Liberty Fund, Inc. All inquiries should be addressed to Liberty Fund, Inc., 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-1684. Facsimile title and part title pages from Volume I of Hume: Hume, David, 1711–1776. In his brief autobiography, was received well from the outset both at home and abroad.


Comments Selected Essays Hume

The Latest from ©