From a scholarly point-of-view, even Christian scholarship, the term glossolalia occurs under five conditions: A human produces a connected sequence of speech sounds.
Those sounds are not identifiable as belonging to any natural language that the individual knows or with which they are familiar.
Act 2 And they were all filled with the holy Spirit and began to speak in different tongues To speak in different tongues: ecstatic prayer in praise of God, interpreted in Acts 2:6, 11 as speaking in foreign languages, symbolizing the worldwide mission of the church (Urick 2009 Chapter 4).
Acts for they could hear them speaking in tongues and glorifying God These were people from another land according to the apostles; tongues probably means foreign languages not understood (Dibelius and Hanson 2004).
Paul says a tongue is speaking to and with God rather than men (1 Cor 14:2), and that it edifies the person actually speaking (1 Cor 14:4).
However, there is also evidence in words like interpreter, foreign land, etc.This phenomenon is also commonly seen in large crowds who are mesmerized by the speaker or event, or, "a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action (Janis 1972 9).Indeed, because the religious experience is so deeply personal and unique, it is almost sacrosanct to suggest that an individual who claims they are "touched by the Holy Spirit" may simply be caught up in an alternate reality, which, quite possibly could be identical.The word glossa, in fact appears over 50 times in the Greek New Testament, and depending on the context and modifying words seems to refer more to what we would now term "foreign language," or even more simply "language." For instance, in Acts the phrase, "my tongue was glad" likely meant "I was happy to say." Similarly in Mark Jesus noted, "And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name they shall cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues." This has often been interpreted as justification for glossolalia, but could also mean that Jesus was predicting a world in which his words (Christianity) spread over the face of the earth to peoples speaking languages unheard of in the Biblical World.Even with 25 uses in Corinthians, one could easily interpret the use of tongues as a metaphor for making oneself understood to a new group -- that is either explaining the meaning of the Gospels to those who did not quite understand, or proselytizing to those who had no experience with the material.Acts 19:6 And when Paul laid (his) hands on them, the holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied.The gift was to allow the faithful to travel throughout the world in order to preach -- without the gift of tongues, they could not make themselves be understood by other cultures (Ellis 1970).It appears as a phenomenon in the New Testament; specifically in Acts 2:4 ("they began to speak with other tongues," and in Corinthians 12:8-11 and -30 where the word appears in conjunction with the Greek word charisma, suggesting that these were gifts given by God to people who had transcended and were able to mentally touch the Divine (Wallace and Sawyer 2005 255).Of course, one of the seminal concerns regarding the Biblical use of the word "tongues" is the dual and contextual meaning it had in Ancient Greek.1 Corinthians 13:1 If I speak in human and angelic tongues but do not have love, I am a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal Witness issues of symbolism and personification.Here Paul does not state that he had tongues of angels, he stated "If" to give indication that he was only making the point about LOVE (Ibid.) 1 Corinthians 14:2 For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to human beings but to God, for no one listens; he utters mysteries in spirit.