Tags: Rutgers Essay Question DiversityDivorce Rate Cause And Effect EssayRambling DissertationsShort Business Plan OutlineKhadijah Williams College EssayDo Colleges Read Your EssayEssay About Cheesecake Factory
But the higher the impact factor, the greater benefit you will receive.
Writing with the reader in mind can boost the citation rate of scientific articles.
Based on our data, this boost occurs wherever you publish.
To capture variety within scientific publishing, we selected articles across three disciplines—environmental science, social science, and medical science.
We then selected a specific topic representing each discipline: biodiversity loss, social media in education, and childhood obesity.
The grey bars represent articles written in the traditional style, and the gold bars represent articles written more with the reader in mind.
Our results suggest that writing more with the reader mind produces more citations, regardless of career stage or where you aim to publish. Article content and the context in which it was written can determine how influential an article is, regardless of writing style.To test whether there is a benefit to writing better, we converted our 11 components into a single quantifiable index we call the writing index (see ).Our analysis suggests that influential articles (those earning 100–1000 cites) had more positive writing components and were thus written more with the reader in mind.These selections enabled us to analyze language and influence without the confounding factors associated with the article topic; different topics will attract different levels of attention regardless of how the articles are written.We obtained abstracts from Scopus by stratifying search results by citations and randomly sampling from within citation groups.It also received 28 testimonials from readers, earning it our reader-approved status. Publishing a research paper in a peer-reviewed journal is an important activity within the academic community.It allows you to network with other scholars, get your name and work into circulation, and further refine your ideas and research.This diversity suggests that there is no single formula for writing better. Our model suggests that increases in clarity, narrative structure, and creativity could translate to a boost in citations (Fig. Interestingly, an increase in citations was related to journal influence so that researchers publishing in broader journals had a greater increase in citations (impact factor 12, 74%) compared with researchers publishing in local or specific journals (impact factor 3, 26%).This suggests that the traditional style of scientific writing appears to restrain citations, but clarity, creativity, and narrative could remove this restraint and maximize citations.As a proxy for reviewing complete articles, we analyzed the abstracts, which reflect the overall writing style of entire articles (9).The abstracts were published in 2012 or 2013 and represented three timely topics with varying levels of influence (defined as the number of citations) in their respective disciplines.